In:
Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics, AIP Publishing, Vol. 35, No. 2 ( 2022-04-01), p. 383-389
Abstract:
The divergent behavior of C−H bond oxidations of aliphatic substrates compared to those of aromatic substrates shown in Gupta's experiment was mechanistically studied herein by means of density functional theory calculations. Our calculations reveal that such difference is caused by different reaction mechanisms between two kinds of substrates (the aliphatic cyclohexane, 2,3-dimethylbutane and the aromatic toluene, ethylbenzene and cumene). For the aliphatic substrates, C−H oxidation by the oxidant FeV(O)(TAML) is a hydrogen atom transfer process; whereas for the aromatic substrates, C−H oxidation is a proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) process with a proton transfer character on the transition state, that is, a proton-coupled electron transfer process holding a proton transfer-like transition state (PCET(PT)). This difference is caused by the strong π−π interactions between the tetra-anionic TAML ring and the phenyl ring of the aromatic substrates, which has a “pull” effect to make the electron transfer from substrates to the Fe=O moiety inefficient.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1674-0068
,
2327-2244
DOI:
10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2111230
Language:
English
Publisher:
AIP Publishing
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2381472-X
SSG:
6,25
