In:
JNCI Cancer Spectrum, Oxford University Press (OUP)
Abstract:
We aimed to define levels of unmet supportive care needs in people with primary brain tumour and reach expert consensus on feasibility of addressing patients’ needs in clinical practice. Methods We conducted secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of people diagnosed with high-grade glioma (n = 116) who completed the Supportive Care Needs Survey-SF34 during adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Participants were allocated to one of three categories: no need (‘no need’ for help on all items), low need (‘low need’ for help on at least one item, but no ‘moderate’ or ‘high’ need), or moderate/high need (at least one ‘moderate’ or ‘high’ need indicated). Clinical capacity to respond to the proportion of patients needing to be prioritised was assessed. Results Overall, 13% (n = 5) were categorised as no need, 23% (n = 27) low need, and 64% (n = 74) moderate/high need. At least one moderate/high need was reported in the physical and daily living domain (42%), and psychological (34%) domain. In recognition of health system capacity, the moderate/high need category was modified to distinguish between: moderate need (‘moderate’ need indicated for at least one item but ‘high’ need was not selected for any item) and high need (at least one ‘high’ need indicated). Results revealed 24% (n = 28) moderate need and 40% (n = 46) high need. Those categorised as high need indicated needing assistance navigating the health system and information. Conclusions Using four step allocations resulted in 40% of patients indicating high need. Categories may facilitate appropriate triaging, and guide stepped models of healthcare delivery.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
2515-5091
DOI:
10.1093/jncics/pkae034
Language:
English
Publisher:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Date:
2024
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2975772-1
