In:
Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 4, No. suppl_1 ( 2017-10-01), p. S395-S395
Kurzfassung:
The Ad Hoc C. difficile surveillance working group defines recurrent C. difficile infection as a second episode occurring & gt;8 weeks after the index case. Due to its high sensitivity, diagnosis of recurrent CDI by PCR is extremely challenging in patients who may have persistent, PCR detectable shedding of toxigenic C. difficile (TCD) for an extended period of time after treatment of the initial CDI episode. CYT, which detects C. difficile toxin antigen, is a cumbersome test to perform but is considered as the current clinical diagnostic gold standard for CDI diagnosis. Aim: To determine the CYT and Toxin A/B EIA positivity among patients with recurrent CDI episodes detected by PCR. We further characterized the performance of diagnostic tests based on whether the recurrent episode was a relapse or reinfection. Methods During a three month study period, CYT and Tox A/B EIA was performed on consecutive stool samples submitted from PCR positive recurrent episodes of CDI. For the purpose of this study, recurrence was defined as a second episode of CDI that occurred within 120 days from the most recent episode. MLST analysis was performed as previously described to characterize relapse and reinfection among the recurrent episodes (2). Results Thirty-five recurrent episodes occurred over the study period. 21/35 [60%] were positive by CYT and 12/35 [34%] by Tox A/B EIA. Among the recurrent CDI episodes, 16 (46%) were genotypical confirmed as relapse with the original infecting strain. Majority of these relapses were positive by CYT (81%) when compared with Tox EIA (43%). Among patients with geno typically confirmed reinfection (n = 8), CYT and EIA positivity was 63 % and 50 % respectively. For the remaining 11 episodes, TCD was not retrievable in culture, CYT and EIA positivity among this group was 27 % and 9 % respectively. Conclusion Forty percent of recurrent CDI episodes detected by PCR could not be confirmed by CYT. EIA missed 66 % of CYT positive recurrent CDI. The performance of CYT and EIA varied among recurrences due to relapse and reinfection. These results have significant implication for reporting of CDI HAI rates. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
Materialart:
Online-Ressource
ISSN:
2328-8957
DOI:
10.1093/ofid/ofx163.984
Sprache:
Englisch
Verlag:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publikationsdatum:
2017
ZDB Id:
2757767-3
