Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2021
    In:  Obstetrics & Gynecology Vol. 138, No. 5 ( 2021-11), p. 788-794
    In: Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 138, No. 5 ( 2021-11), p. 788-794
    Kurzfassung: To evaluate patient safety, resource utilization, and transfusion-related cost after a policy change from universal type and screen to selective type and screen on admission to labor and delivery. METHODS: Between October 2017 and September 2019, we performed a single-center implementation study focusing on risk-based type and screen instead of universal type and screen. Implementation of our policy was October 2018 and compared 1 year preimplementation with 1 year postimplementation. Patients were risk-stratified in alignment with California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative recommendations. Under the new policy, the blood bank holds a blood sample for processing (hold clot) on patients at low- and medium-risk of hemorrhage. Type and screen and crossmatch are obtained on high-risk patients or with a prior positive antibody screen. We collected patient outcomes, safety and cost data, and compliance and resource utilization metrics. Cost included direct costs of transfusion-related testing in the labor and delivery unit during the study period, from a health system perspective. RESULTS: In 1 year postimplementation, there were no differences in emergency-release transfusion events (4 vs 3, P 〉 .99). There were fewer emergency-release red blood cell (RBC) units transfused (9 vs 24, P =.002) and O-negative RBC units transfused (8 vs 18, P =.016) postimplementation compared with preimplementation. Hysterectomies (0.05% vs 0.1%, P =.44) and intensive care unit admissions (0.45% vs 0.51%, P =.43) were not different postimplementation compared with preimplementation. Postimplementation, mean monthly type and screen-related costs (ABO typing, antibody screen, and antibody workup costs) were lower, $9,753 compared with $20,676 in the preimplementation year, P 〈 .001. CONCLUSION: Implementation of selective type and screen policy in the labor and delivery unit was associated with projected annual savings of $181,000 in an institution with 4,000 deliveries per year, without evidence of increased maternal morbidity.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0029-7844
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 2012791-1
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz