Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 40, No. 8 ( 2021-08), p. e300-e304
    Abstract: Saliva reverse transcriptase-Polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is an attractive alternative for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in adults with less known in children. Methods: Children with coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms were prospectively enrolled in a 1-month comparative clinical trial of saliva and nasopharyngeal (NP) RT-PCR. Detection rates and sensitivities of saliva and NP RT-PCR were compared as well as discordant NP and saliva RT-PCR findings including viral loads (VLs). Results: Of 405 patients enrolled, 397 patients had 2 tests performed. Mean age was 12.7 years (range, 1.2–17.9). Sensitivity of saliva was 85.2% (95% confidence interval: 78.2%–92.1%) when using NP as the standard; sensitivity of NP was 94.5% (89.8%–99.2%) when saliva was considered as the standard. For a NP RT-PCR VL threshold of ≥10 3 and ≥10 4 copies/mL, sensitivity of saliva increases to 88.7% and 95.2%, respectively. Sensitivity of saliva and NP swabs was, respectively, 89.5% and 95.3% in patient with symptoms less than 4 days ( P = 0.249) and 70.0% and 95.0% in those with symptoms ≥4–7 days ( P = 0.096). The 15 patients who had an isolated positive NP RT-PCR were younger ( P = 0.034), had lower NP VL (median 5.6 × 10 3 vs. 3.9 × 10 7 , P 〈 0.001), and could not drool saliva at the end of the sampling ( P = 0.002). VLs were lower with saliva than with NP RT-PCR (median 8.7 cp/mL × 10 4 ; interquartile range 1.2 × 10 4 –5.2 × 10 5 ; vs. median 4.0 × 10 7 cp/mL; interquartile range, 8.6 × 10 5 –1 × 10 8 ; P 〈 0.001). Conclusions: While RT-PCR testing on saliva performed more poorly in younger children and likely after longer duration of symptoms, saliva remains an attractive alternative to NP swabs in children.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0891-3668
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 392481-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages