In:
Journal of Forensic Sciences, Wiley, Vol. 65, No. 4 ( 2020-07), p. 1102-1113
Abstract:
Gunshot residue (GSR) analysis and their interpretation provide crucial information on a criminal investigation involving the use of firearms. To date, several approaches have been proposed for the implementation of a combined sampling and analysis of inorganic (IGSR) and organic GSR (OGSR). However, it is not clear at this stage if concurrent analyses of both types of residue might be detrimental to the analysis of IGSR currently applied in forensic laboratories. Thus, this work aims to compare and evaluate three different protocols for the combined collection and analysis of IGSR and OGSR. These methods, respectively, involve the use of a modified stub (with two halves, one for the detection of IGSR and the other for the analysis of OGSR); the sequential recovery of GSR with two stubs mounted with different adhesives (double‐sided carbon tape and Tesa® TACK) and the sequential analysis of IGSR and OGSR from a single carbon stub following carbon deposition. The detection of IGSR was carried out using SEM‐EDX, while OGSR analysis was performed using ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC‐MS/MS). Obtained results for experiments performed using Geco Sinoxid ® ammunition indicated that sequential analysis was the most suitable protocol for the combined collection and analysis of both IGSR and OGSR. A higher number of inorganic (characteristic and consistent) particles and higher concentrations of ethylcentralite, N ‐nitrosodiphenylamine, diphenylamine, and nitroglycerin were recovered with this method.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0022-1198
,
1556-4029
DOI:
10.1111/1556-4029.14314
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2020
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2026357-0
SSG:
2,1
