In:
Colorectal Disease, Wiley
Abstract:
No studies have compared the clinical outcomes of early and delayed feeding in patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB). This study aimed to evaluate the benefits and risks of early feeding in a nationwide cohort of patients with ALGIB in whom haemostasis was achieved. Methods We reviewed data for 5910 patients with ALGIB in whom haemostasis was achieved and feeding was resumed within 3 days after colonoscopy at 49 hospitals across Japan (CODE BLUE‐J Study). Patients were divided into an early feeding group (≤1 day, n = 3324) and a delayed feeding group (2–3 days, n = 2586). Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups by propensity matching analysis of 1508 pairs. Results There was no significant difference between the early and delayed feeding groups in the rebleeding rate within 7 days after colonoscopy (9.4% vs. 8.0%; p = 0.196) or in the rebleeding rate within 30 days (11.4% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.909). There was also no significant between‐group difference in the need for interventional radiology or surgery or in mortality. However, the median length of hospital stay after colonoscopy was significantly shorter in the early feeding group (5 vs. 7 days; p 〈 0.001). These results were unchanged when subgroups of presumptive and definitive colonic diverticular bleeding were compared. Conclusion The findings of this nationwide study suggest that early feeding after haemostasis can shorten the hospital stay in patients with ALGIB without increasing the risk of rebleeding.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1462-8910
,
1463-1318
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2023
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2004820-8