Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: European Journal of Neurology, Wiley, Vol. 30, No. 10 ( 2023-10), p. 3314-3321
    Abstract: In idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features are promising diagnostic markers, but the impact of rater experience and the specific referral question is unknown. Methods From the Vienna Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension database, patients were included with definitive IIH and routine cranial MRI performed during diagnostic work‐up. Frequencies of partial empty sella (ES), optic nerve sheath distension (ONSD), optic nerve tortuosity (ONT), posterior globe flattening (PGF) and transverse sinus stenosis (TSS) were compared in three settings: (i) real‐world rating, (ii) junior neuroradiologist without special IIH training and (iii) senior neuroradiologist with experience in IIH imaging (gold standard). Results Magnetic resonance imaging scans of 84 IIH patients (88% female, mean age 33.5 years) were evaluated. By gold standard, ONSD was the most frequent (64.3%) followed by TSS (60.0%), ONT (46.4%), ES (44.4%) and PGF (23.8%). Compared to the gold standard, IIH features were described significantly less frequently in routine MRI reports (ONSD 28.6%, ONT 13.1%, PGF 4.8%, TSS 42.9%, p   〈  0.01 respectively) except for ES (42.9%, p  = 0.9). A specific referral question regarding IIH increased detection rates in routine reports, but rates remained significantly lower than by gold standard. In contrast, a rating by a neuroradiologist without special training produced significantly higher frequencies of ONSD (81.0%, p   〈  0.01) and ONT (60.7%, p   〈  0.01) but not of ES (47.6%), PGF (29.8%) and TSS (68.1%). Conclusions Idiopathic intracranial hypertension MRI features are underestimated in routine MRI reports and partly overcalled by less experienced neuroradiologists, driven by features less well known or methodologically difficult. Reevaluation of MRI scans by an experienced rater (and to a lesser degree a specific referral question) improves diagnostic accuracy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1351-5101 , 1468-1331
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2020241-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages