In:
Equine Veterinary Journal, Wiley, Vol. 53, No. 6 ( 2021-11), p. 1277-1286
Abstract:
Intra‐articular triamcinolone acetonide is a widely used treatment for joint inflammation despite limited scientific evidence of its efficacy. Objectives To investigate if intra‐articular triamcinolone acetonide has sustained anti‐inflammatory effects using an equine model of repeated joint inflammation. Study design Randomised controlled experimental study. Method For three consecutive cycles 2 weeks apart, inflammation was induced in both middle carpal joints of eight horses by injecting 0.25 ng lipopolysaccharide (LPS). After the first LPS injection only, treatment with 12 mg triamcinolone acetonide (TA) followed in one randomly assigned joint, while the contralateral joint was treated with sterile saline (control). Clinical parameters (composite welfare scores, joint effusion, joint circumference) were recorded and synovial fluid samples were analysed for various biomarkers (total protein, WBCC; PGE 2 ; CCL2; TNFα; MMP; GAGs; C2C; CPII) at fixed timepoints (post injection hours 0, 8, 24, 72 and 168). The effects of time and treatment on clinical and synovial fluid parameters and the presence of time–treatment interactions were tested using a linear mixed model for repeated measures with horse as a random effect, and time and treatment as fixed effects. Results The TA treated joints showed significantly higher peak synovial GAG concentrations (Difference in means 283.1875 µg/mL, 95% CI 179.8, 386.6, P 〈 0.000), and PGE 2 levels (Difference in means 77.8025 pg/mL, 95% CI 21.2, 134.4, P 〈 0.007) after the first inflammation induction. Significantly lower TP levels were seen with TA treatment after the second induction (Difference in means −7.5 g/L, 95% CI −14.8, −0.20, P 〈 0.04) . Significantly lower WBCC levels were noted with TA treatment after the first (Difference in means −23.7125 × 10 9 cells/L, 95% CI −46.7, −0.7, P 〈 0.04) and second (Difference in means −35.95 × 10 9 cells/L, 95% CI −59.0, −12.9, P 〈 0.002) inflammation inductions. Significantly lower general MMP activity was also seen with TA treatment after the second inflammation inductions (Difference in means −51.65 RFU/s, 95% CI −92.4, −10.9, P 〈 0.01). Main limitations This experimental study cannot fully reflect natural joint disease. Conclusions In this model, intra‐articular TA seems to have some anti‐inflammatory activity (demonstrated by reductions in TP, WBCC and general MMP activity) up to 2 weeks post treatment but not at 4 weeks. This anti‐inflammatory effect appeared to outlast a shorter‐lived, potentially detrimental effect illustrated by increased synovial GAG and PGE 2 levels after the first induction.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0425-1644
,
2042-3306
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2021
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2205089-9
SSG:
12
