In:
Hepatology Research, Wiley, Vol. 49, No. 9 ( 2019-09), p. 1054-1065
Abstract:
This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of candidates for second‐line therapy, including regorafenib and ramucirumab, for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after sorafenib treatment. Methods Of 122 patients, 103 were radiologically confirmed as progressive disease (PD) (sorafenib‐refractory group), and 19 discontinued sorafenib therapy due to adverse events prior to radiologic PD (sorafenib‐intolerant group). Patients in the sorafenib‐refractory group were divided into two subgroups each, according to their eligibility for second‐line treatment (second‐line‐in and ‐out group), regorafenib (RESORCE‐in and ‐out group), or ramucirumab (REACH‐2‐in and ‐out group). Results Patients included in the non‐candidate group were those with α‐fetoprotein level 〈 400 ng/mL ( n = 51, 49.5%), daily sorafenib dose 〈 400 mg ( n = 44, 42.7%), Child–Pugh B or C ( n = 40, 38.8%), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score ≥2 ( n = 24, 23.3%). The percentages of candidates were 57.3% for second‐line, 35.0% for regorafenib, and 23.3% for ramucirumab. The median post‐progression survival (PPS) was significantly longer for the second‐line‐in and the RESORCE‐in groups than in the non‐candidate groups (12.6 and 11.0 months vs. 3.0 and 6.1 months, respectively). The PPS was not significantly different between the REACH‐2‐in and ‐out groups. A significant predictor of candidates for second‐line treatment at sorafenib initiation was a Child–Pugh score of 5 (A5). Conclusions Not all patients refractory to sorafenib were candidates for second‐line therapy. A Child–Pugh score of A5 at sorafenib initiation was an important and favorable factor related to eligibility for second‐line therapy and good outcomes.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1386-6346
,
1872-034X
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2019
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2006439-1
