Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2005
    In:  BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Vol. 112, No. 9 ( 2005-09), p. 1221-1228
    In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Wiley, Vol. 112, No. 9 ( 2005-09), p. 1221-1228
    Abstract: Objective  To determine the prevalence of uterine rupture worldwide. Design  Systematic review of all available data since 1990. Setting  Community‐based and facility‐based reports from urban and rural studies worldwide. Sample  Eighty‐three reports of uterine rupture rates are included in the systematic review. Most are facility based using cross‐sectional study designs. Methods  Following a pre‐defined protocol an extensive search was conducted of 10 electronic databases as well as other sources. Articles were evaluated according to specified inclusion criteria. Uterine rupture data were collected along with information on the quality of reporting including definitions and identification of cases. Data were entered into a database and tabulated using SAS software. Main outcome measures  Prevalence of uterine rupture by country, period, study design, setting, participants, facility type and data source. Results  Prevalence figures for uterine rupture were available for 86 groups of women. For unselected pregnant women, the prevalence of uterine rupture reported was considerably lower for community‐based (median 0.053, range 0.016–0.30%) than for facility‐based studies (0.31, 0.012–2.9%). The prevalence tended to be lower for countries defined by the United Nations as developed than the less or least developed countries. For women with previous caesarean section, the prevalence of uterine rupture reported was in the region of 1%. Only one report gave a prevalence for women without previous caesarean section, from a developed country, and this was extremely low (0.006%). Conclusion  In less and least developed countries, uterine rupture is more prevalent than in developed countries. In developed countries most uterine ruptures follow caesarean section. Future research on the prevalence of uterine rupture should differentiate between uterine rupture with and without previous caesarean section.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1470-0328 , 1471-0528
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036469-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages