In:
Hemodialysis International, Wiley, Vol. 15, No. 4 ( 2011-10), p. 522-529
Abstract:
Cost reduction and quality improvement seem to be conflicting issues. However, online hemodiafiltration ( oHDF ) with new automatic functions offers a cost‐efficient therapy compared to hemodialysis ( HD ). Seven dialysis centers conducted a randomized clinical trial with cross‐over design: high‐flux HD vs. postdilutional oHDF with functions coupling both dialysate and substitution flow rates to blood flow rates. During the 6 weeks of the study, all treatment parameters remained unchanged for HD and oHDF , apart from dialysate and substitution flow rate. Treatment data were recorded during each treatment, and predialytic and postdialytic concentrations of urea were recorded at the end of each study phase. The analysis involved 956 treatments of 54 patients. The mean dialysate consumption was 123.2 ± 6.4 l for HD and 113.4 ± 14.9 l for oHDF (p 〈 0.0001), the mean dialysis dose was 1.42 ± 0.23 for HD and 1.47 ± 0.26 for oHDF (p 〈 0.0001); oHDF resulted in a lower dialysate consumption (8.0% less) and a slightly increased dialysis dose ( Kt/V 3.5% higher) compared to HD . oHDF with the investigated automatic functions offers substantial savings in dialysate consumption without decreasing dialysis dose.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1492-7535
,
1542-4758
DOI:
10.1111/hdi.2011.15.issue-4
DOI:
10.1111/j.1542-4758.2011.00577.x
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2011
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2103570-2
