In:
Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Wiley, Vol. 95, No. 1 ( 2012-01), p. 269-274
Kurzfassung:
Given the emerging role of oxide spinels as hole conductors, we discuss in this article the traditional vs. new methodologies of determining the type of conduction mechanism at play––localized polaronic vs. band‐like transport. Applying (i) traditional small polaron analysis to our in‐situ high temperature four‐point conductivity and thermopower measurements, we previously found an activated mobility, which is indicative of the small polaron mechanism. However, (ii) employing the recent developments in correcting density functional methodologies for hole localization, we predict that the self‐trapped hole is unstable and that Rh 2 ZnO 4 is instead a band conductor with a large effective mass. The hole mobility measured by high‐field room temperature Hall effect also suggests band rather than polaron conduction. The apparent contradiction between the conclusion of the traditional procedure (i) and first‐principles theory (ii) is resolved by taking into account in the previous transport analysis the temperature dependence of the effective density of states, which leads to the result that the mobility is actually temperature‐independent in Rh 2 ZnO 4 . Our case study on Rh 2 ZnO 4 illustrates the range of experimental and theoretical approaches at hand to determine whether the transport mechanism of a semiconductor is band or small polaron conduction.
Materialart:
Online-Ressource
ISSN:
0002-7820
,
1551-2916
DOI:
10.1111/jace.2011.95.issue-1
DOI:
10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04771.x
Sprache:
Englisch
Verlag:
Wiley
Publikationsdatum:
2012
ZDB Id:
2008170-4
ZDB Id:
219232-9
