Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SRUMB - Romanian Society for Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology ; 2018
    In:  Medical Ultrasonography Vol. 20, No. 3 ( 2018-08-30), p. 298-
    In: Medical Ultrasonography, SRUMB - Romanian Society for Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 20, No. 3 ( 2018-08-30), p. 298-
    Abstract: Aim: Renal artery duplex ultrasonography (RDU) is an effective and non-invasive screening test in diagnosing renal artery stenosis. The discordance of results in multiple RDU is common. We aim to evaluate the discordance and the reasons for discordance between diagnoses and measurements from multiple RDU examinations.Material and method: A retrospective study was performed in 64 examinations of renal arteries from 32 patients that were referred for two or more RDU examinations and renal artery digital subtraction angiography (DSA) within six months, between August 2013 and January 2016. Using DSA as gold standard, we divided the renal arteries into three groups: discordant (one diagnosis of RDU was correct and one was wrong), misdiagnosed (neither RDU diagnosis was correct) and correct (both RDU diagnoses were correct) groups.We evaluated the discordance and reasons for discordance of diagnoses and measurements from multiple RDU examinations. Results: Among 64 renal arteries included in this study, 37 renal arteries had two correct diagnoses, 19 renal arteries had two discordant diagnoses, and eight renal arteries were misdiagnosed twice by RDU. The discordance of peak systolic velocity (PSV), the ratio between PSV in the renal artery with stenosis and PSV in the aorta (RAR), and tardus-parvus waveform measurements were clearly higher in the discordant diagnoses group than in the correctly diagnosed group. The most common reason for a discordant diagnosis was failure in obtaining correct tardus-parvus waveforms of the interlobar artery (26.31%). Themost common reason for misdiagnosis was the presence of an extremely severe stenosis with an atrophic kidney (31.25%). Overall, 87.50% of patients underwent RDU examinations had correct diagnoses of stenosis or occlusion at least once (including location and degree), as confirmed by DSA.Conclusions: Our study indicates that standard operating procedures and improvements in examination technique by ultrasound doctors could reduce the discordance between multiple tests. 
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2066-8643 , 1844-4172
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: SRUMB - Romanian Society for Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2529623-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages