Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Human Kinetics ; 2020
    In:  International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance Vol. 15, No. 10 ( 2020-11-1), p. 1400-1405
    In: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Human Kinetics, Vol. 15, No. 10 ( 2020-11-1), p. 1400-1405
    Abstract: Purpose : To analyze the energetic profiles of the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Tests 1 and 2 (YYIR1 and YYIR2). Methods : Intermittent running distance (IR1D and IR2D), time to exhaustion (IR1T and IR2T), and total recovery time between shuttles (IR1R and IR2R) were measured in 10 well-trained male athletes (age 24.4 [2.0] y, height 182 [1] cm, weight 75.8 [7.9] kg). Respiratory gases and blood lactate (BLC) were obtained preexercise, during exercise, and until 15 min postexercise. Metabolic energy, average metabolic power , and energy share (percentage of aerobic [ W AER ], anaerobic lactic [ W BLC ], and anaerobic alactic energy system [ W PCr ]) were calculated using the PCr-La-O 2 method. Results : Peak oxygen consumption was possibly higher in YYIR2 (60.3 [5.1] mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ) than in YYIR1 ( P  = .116, 57.7 [4.5] mL·kg −1 ·min −1 , d  = −0.58). IR1D, IR1T, and IR1R were very likely higher than IR2D, IR2T, and IR2R, respectively ( P   〈  .001, 1876 [391] vs 672 [132]  m, d  = −2.83; P   〈  .001, 916 [175] vs 304 [57]  s, d  = −3.03; and P   〈  .001, 460 [100] vs 150 [40]  s, d  = −2.83). Metabolic energy was most likely lower in YYIR2 than in YYIR1 ( P   〈  .001, 493.5 [118.1] vs 984.8 [171.7]  kJ, d  = 3.24). Average metabolic power was most likely higher in YYIR2 than in YYIR1 ( P   〈  .001, 21.5 [1.7] vs 14.5 [2.2]  W·kg −1 , d  = 3.54). When considering aerobic phosphocreatine restoration during breaks between shuttles, W AER ( P  = .693, 49% [10%] vs 48% [5%] , d  = −0.16) was similar, W PCr ( P  = .165, 47% [11%] vs 42% [6%] , d  = −0.54) possibly higher, and W BLC ( P   〈  .001, 4% [1%] vs 10% [3%] , d  = 1.95) almost certainly lower in YYIR1 than in YYIR2. Conclusions : W AER and W PCr are predominant in YYIR1 and YYIR2 with almost identical W AER . Higher IR1D and IR1T in YYIR1 result in higher metabolic energy but lower average metabolic power and slightly lower peak oxygen consumption. Higher IR1R allows for higher reliance on W PCr in YYIR1, while YYIR2 requires a higher fraction of W BLC .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1555-0265 , 1555-0273
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Human Kinetics
    Publication Date: 2020
    SSG: 31
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages