In:
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition, BMJ
Kurzfassung:
A shared decision-making (SDM) approach is recommended for prenatal decisions at the limit of viability, with a guiding role for parental values. People born extremely premature experience the consequences of the decision made, but information about their perspectives on prenatal decisions is lacking. Therefore, this study aims to describe their perspectives on what is important in decision-making at the limit of viability. Design Semi-structured focus group discussions were conducted, recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were independently analysed by two researchers in Atlas.ti. Results Four focus groups were conducted in the Netherlands, with five to six participants each, born between 24 0/7 and 30 0/7 weeks gestation in the period between 1965 and 2002. Considering their personal life experiences and how their extremely premature birth affected their families, the participants reflected on decision-making at the limit of viability. Various considerations were discussed and summarised into the following themes: anticipated parental regret, the wish to look at the baby directly after birth, to give the infant a chance at survival, quality of life, long-term outcomes for the infant and the family, and religious or spiritual considerations. Conclusions Insights into the perspectives of adults born extremely premature deepened our understanding of values considered in decision-making at the limit of viability. Results point out the need for a more individualised prediction of the prognosis and more extensive information on the lifelong impact of an extremely premature birth on both the infant and the family. This could help future parents and healthcare professionals in value-laden decision-making.
Materialart:
Online-Ressource
ISSN:
1359-2998
,
1468-2052
DOI:
10.1136/archdischild-2023-325997
Sprache:
Englisch
Verlag:
BMJ
Publikationsdatum:
2023
ZDB Id:
2188490-0
