Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, S. Karger AG, Vol. 46, No. 6 ( 2019), p. 353-359
    Abstract: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Objective: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 To evaluate the presence of maxillary gap (MG) and abnormal retronasal triangle (RT) as markers of cleft palate (CP) with and without cleft lip in the first trimester and to assess their association with the type of orofacial cleft (OC). 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 The RT and the mid-sagittal view of the face were evaluated retrospectively by two operators in 26 fetuses with OC and in 80 normal controls to detect abnormal RT and/or MG. The agreement between operators was calculated. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Amongst the 26 fetuses, there were 15 cases of bilateral, 6 cases of unilateral, and 4 cases of median cleft lip and palate, and 1 case of CP alone. The MG was observed in 18 cases by operator 1 and in 17 cases by operator 2; an abnormal RT was detected in 21 cases by operator 1 and in 22 cases by operator 2. Great agreement between operators was obtained. In controls, MG or abnormal RT was suspected in 6 and 2–4% of cases, respectively. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Conclusions: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 RT seems to be more sensitive compared to MG; however, the latter showed an additional diagnostic ability when the secondary palate was involved. Both approaches in combination could be useful in detecting OC in the first trimester.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1015-3837 , 1421-9964
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1482292-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages