Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 1996
    In:  Stroke Vol. 27, No. 1 ( 1996-01), p. 101-104
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 27, No. 1 ( 1996-01), p. 101-104
    Abstract: Background and Purpose Power-based transcanial color-coded duplex sonography (p-TCCD) is a new ultrasonic method that has advantages compared with frequency-based TCCD (f-TCCD), since it is essentially independent of the angle of insonation, not subject to aliasing, and has a better signal-to-noise ratio. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of p-TCCD to visualize flow in cerebral parenchyma and to compare the advantages, limitations, and reliability of velocity measurements of p-TCCD versus f-TCCD in the major basal cerebral arteries of normal subjects. Methods Two investigators performed 15 p-TCCD and 15 f-TCCD studies in 30 normal subjects with adequate ultrasonic windows. Each investigator did a p-TCCD or f-TCCD study in every patient, and each was blinded in every case to the results of the other. Peak systolic (V s ) and end-diastolic (V d ) velocities were determined in the anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral, basilar, and vertebral arteries. The reliability of p-TCCD velocimetry was evaluated by calculating both the correlation coefficient ( r ) of the difference between p-TCCD versus f-TCCD measurements and the coefficient of variation (CV), defined as the difference between the mean values for p-TCCD and f-TCCD divided by the mean values for f-TCCD measurements, expressed as percent. Results p-TCCD did not display flow in cerebral parenchyma but depicted arteries with a course perpendicular to that of the ultrasound beam and showed good reliability of velocity measurements in all examined arteries: for V s , r was .84 to .93 ( P 〈 .001) and CV was 7.7% to 10.8%; for V d , r was .87 to .90 ( P 〈 .001) and CV was 10.3% to 13.7%. The lack of directional and velocity information and tissue motion artifacts were unimportant limitations in p-TCCD. Conclusions Compared with f-TCCD, p-TCCD had no important advantages but had several unimportant limitations in a study of normal adults with adequate ultrasonic windows.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 1996
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages