Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 144, No. Suppl_1 ( 2021-11-16)
    Abstract: Introduction: Congestive heart failure (CHF) in acute phase, many clinical fundamental parameters including vital sign, laboratory data, or initial treatment were investigated, and we can roughly estimate the prognosis with the parameters. However, machine learning method for prediction of the prognosis is still challenging. Hypothesis: Machine learning methods have higher performance for predicting cardiac prognosis in patients with CHF than conventional statistical model. Methods: We enrolled consecutive 300 patients with CHF (79.5±12.1 years, 158 Males). Patients with acute coronary syndrome, mechanical circulatory support cases, and cardio-pulmonary arrest cases were excluded. Objective variable was set as cardiac death in one year. First, multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis with Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) was performed, and extracted parameters which had the most versatile predictive value. Propensity score (PS) was calculated with the extracted parameters, and the prediction model constructed by cut-off value of ROC curve analysis of PS. Next, machine learning (random forest method and deep learning) to build predictive model was performed with the predictors. Finally, accuracy of each predictive model was compared. Results: Thirty cases showed cardiac death in one year. Logistic regression with AIC extracted 8 predictors, and the cut off-value of propensity score with the 8 parameters was 0.110. The accuracy was 0.714 and area under ROC (AUROC) was 0.836. Conversely, random forest method demonstrated the accuracy as 0.927, AUROC 0.860. On deep learning, the accuracy was 0.937 and AUROC 0.901.The top 4 high feature importance of random forest were Cl/red blood cell count/pH/Anion Gap. However, accuracy of those predictors was lower than that of machine learning. Conclusions: Machine learning was a powerful tool to predict cardiac prognosis of CHF, comparing with conventional statistical model.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages