In:
Global Responsibility to Protect, Brill, Vol. 10, No. 1-2 ( 2018-03-22), p. 97-120
Kurzfassung:
Two-thirds of the global child population lives in countries affected by violent and high-intensity conflict. International humanitarian law provides broad protection for children in the event of armed conflict. However, as the 2017 report of the un Secretary-General on children and armed conflict stresses, the scale and severity of grave violations has increased. This paper addresses the central puzzle of why the existing legal and normative frameworks of child protection have achieved so little, in addressing the marginalisation and disempowerment of children in armed conflict. We argue that the contemporary application of r 2 p in protecting children will be limited unless at least two fundamental challenges are met: (a) taming power politics; and (b) squaring inherent contradictions between the global r 2 p norm and national and regional normative frameworks of child protection. We highlight the case of Japan to illustrate the limits of the contemporary application of r 2 p in protecting children.
Materialart:
Online-Ressource
ISSN:
1875-9858
,
1875-984X
DOI:
10.1163/1875984X-01001006
Sprache:
Unbekannt
Verlag:
Brill
Publikationsdatum:
2018
ZDB Id:
2508925-0
