In:
Journal of Contemporary History, SAGE Publications, Vol. 48, No. 2 ( 2013-04), p. 315-332
Kurzfassung:
This article seeks to understand East German reactions to the Fischer controversy within the broader context of German-German historiographical relations during the Cold War. For an interpretive framework it draws on Christoph Kleßmann’s notion of the history of the two Germanys after 1945 as being the record of an asymmetrical process of ‘intertwining and differentiation’ ( Verflechtung und Abgrenzung). With varying degrees of scepticism and enthusiasm, East German scholars of the First World War sought to maintain links with, and at the same time to distance themselves ideologically from, the ‘Fischer school’ in Hamburg. Beyond this, Fischer’s particular mode of challenging the dominance of the historist tradition in West Germany enjoyed a very positive reception in the GDR and had a genuine and significant impact on the methodological approach and style of argumentation adopted by at least two of the main East German experts on the 1914–18 period. In a final section, the article examines what these findings can tell us more generally about the interlinked nature of East and West German historiography, in spite of the divisions of the Cold War.
Materialart:
Online-Ressource
ISSN:
0022-0094
,
1461-7250
DOI:
10.1177/0022009412472717
Sprache:
Englisch
Verlag:
SAGE Publications
Publikationsdatum:
2013
ZDB Id:
1494064-4
ZDB Id:
3048-X
SSG:
8
SSG:
3,6
