In:
Tumori Journal, SAGE Publications, Vol. 76, No. 5 ( 1990-10), p. 434-438
Kurzfassung:
Structure, performance, management, quality control and participation in screening programs of cervical cytology laboratories have been evaluated through a questionnaire sent to all public Italian hospitals, relevant university departments and senior members of relevant scientific associations. Completed questionnaires were received from 276 centers, which gives a response rate of 73%. In this report we concentrate on the need for improvement, but there are a number of centers who have all or almost all the features traditionally associated with good or excellent practice. The main results of the survey are the following. Most of the centers examine relatively few cervical smears, so their workload could be considered too low for maintaining a good level of practice. Six centers examine 3 specimens per woman, about 25% examine 2 specimens, and the rest only 1 specimen. There is a marked variability in filing and storing practices of positive and negative smears and results. Internal quality control is inadequate in most centers, and external quality control is limited to voluntary exchange of dubious or interesting smears. Only half of the centers are involved in screening programs. In 75% of the programs the suggested screening interval is 1 year or even 6 months; only 7 (4.5%) agree with the UICC/ IARC recommended interval of 3 years. The target population coverage varies from 10% to 85%, and it is less than 50% in 78% of the programs. Only 6 programs have an active women's call system. The survey has confirmed the need for launching a national program of internal and external quality control. Almost all centers have expressed their interest to take part.
Materialart:
Online-Ressource
ISSN:
0300-8916
,
2038-2529
DOI:
10.1177/030089169007600504
Sprache:
Englisch
Verlag:
SAGE Publications
Publikationsdatum:
1990
ZDB Id:
280962-X
ZDB Id:
2267832-3
