Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    SAGE Publications ; 2001
    In:  Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Vol. 15, No. 3 ( 2001-09), p. 183-190
    In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, SAGE Publications, Vol. 15, No. 3 ( 2001-09), p. 183-190
    Kurzfassung: Objective: Selegiline (L-deprenyl) is a selective monoamine oxidase B (MAO- B) inhibitor used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. In addition, it is thought to rescue neurons with a loss of target-derived trophic support. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain these phenomena, such as the production of neurotrophic actions through astrocyte activation, reduction of free radical production, or the pres ence of antiapoptotic properties. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the systemic administration of selegiline facilitates recovery after a cerebral infarction in humans. Methods: This phase II study was randomized, double-blind, and placebo con trolled. Selegiline, 5 mg, or matched placebo was given twice a day for 3 months. The drug therapy was started within 48 h after a hemispheric infarction in the territory of middle cerebral artery. There were 24 patients recruited. Twenty patients were followed up to 3 months or until their death, and they represent the efficacy analysis group. The primary efficacy parameters were Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS), Barthel Index (BI), and Fugl-Meyer Scale (FMS). Secondary parameters were Zung Self-Rating Depres sion Scale (ZDS) and 15-Dimensional Measure of Health Related Quality of Life test (15-D). Results: SSS improved statistically significantly from the baseline when com pared with placebo (p = 0.019). The results were parallel among the other two pri mary efficacy variables (BI and FMS), showing a positive trend for selegiline, although they did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, in the analysis of the secondary efficacy variables, both the 15-D test and ZDS supported this positive trend in favor of selegiline, although no statistically significant differences between groups were found (p = 0.06 in 15-D test). Conclusions: Selegiline seems to be beneficial after a cere bral infarction. This benefit may be due to the enhancement of the recovery process. Key Words: Cerebrovascular disorders—Stroke—Selegiline—L-deprenyl—Recovery of function.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1545-9683 , 1552-6844
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: SAGE Publications
    Publikationsdatum: 2001
    ZDB Id: 2100545-X
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz