Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2019
    In:  European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care Vol. 8, No. 6 ( 2019-09), p. 571-581
    In: European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 8, No. 6 ( 2019-09), p. 571-581
    Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes associated with medical management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting to hospitals with and without onsite catheterization facilities. Methods All patients ( n=25,921) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction ( n=10,563) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction ( n=15,358) in Alberta, Canada between April 2010–March 2016 were categorized according to availability of catheterization facilities at the hospital they presented to and their management strategy (medically managed without coronary angiography or medically managed after coronary angiography). Results: Overall, 51% presented to hospitals without catheterization facilities; and 34% were managed medically (18% without coronary angiography, and 16% after coronary angiography). Rates of medical management were higher at hospitals without versus those with catheterization facilities (43% vs. 24%, p 〈 0.01). However, both the rate of presentation to hospitals without catheterization facilities (70% non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 24% ST-elevation myocardial infarction, p 〈 0.01) and medical management (45% non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 18% ST-elevation myocardial infarction, p 〈 0.01) differed by myocardial infarction type. The lack of catheterization facilities at the presenting hospital had no association with in-hospital mortality in patients medically managed without coronary angiography, but was associated with a lower risk of mortality among patients medically managed after coronary angiography. However, the latter benefit was restricted to non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients only (adjusted hazard ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.25–0.76). Conclusion: The availability of catheterization facilities at the hospital at which non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presented influenced their likelihood of being medically managed, but was not associated with adverse short- or long-term mortality outcomes.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2048-8726 , 2048-8734
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2663340-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages