In:
Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 1822-1822
Abstract:
Background It has been well known that peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) has undergone poor prognosis compared with other non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). Although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) has been proposed to determining prognosis for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) at 2014, there is no study examines whether NCCN-IPI could apply to the T-cell NHLs. In addition, a few studies suggest prognostic utility of interim PET/CT in PTCL, but the role of interim PET/CT is not clear. Purpose We evaluate the predictive efficacy of the NCCN-IPI and interim PET/CT based on visual assessment in patients with newly diagnosed PTCLs. Methods This study included 153 patients with de novo peripheral PTCLs, diagnosed from January 2010 to August 2015. The NCCN-IPI was calculated as following the original references. Survival outcomes were compared with a matched result of IPI and/or Prognostic Index for peripheral T cell lymphoma, unspecified (PIT). Visual assessment of interim PET/CT based on Deauville five point scales was performed at the time of diagnosis, mid-treatment and completion of CHOP/CHOP-like or other non-anthracycline chemotherapy. Results The subtypes of PTCLs included PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (26%), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (20%), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (13%), extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type (35%), and the others (6%). The NCCN-IPI showed better risk-based prognostic discrimination than IPI and PIT, especially between high-intermediate and high risk subgroups (3-year overall survival 40% vs. 27% vs. 26% among the high-intermediate risk group, respectively; 3-year overall survival 15% vs. 33% vs. 32% among the high risk group, respectively) with a median follow-up of 25.1 months (Figure 1). The absolute difference of survival rates between the low and high risk groups was 75% based on the NCCN-IPI stratification compared with 45% on the IPI stratification or 54% on the PIT stratification, respectively. When divided into two histologic subgroups (nodal vs. extra-nodal type), the NCCN-IPI showed considerable discriminatory capacity in both histologic groups. However, the IPI or PIT classification could not have discrimination in extra-nodal PTCLs. The interim PET-CT was significantly predicting for progression free survival in all PTCL patients, however, it also showed no predictive value in the patients with extranodal PTCLs, especially NK/T cell lymphoma. Conclusions The NCCN-IPI is a powerful prognostic model in PTCLs predicting overall survival among high-intermediate and high risk patients. Also, interim PET/CT response based on visual assessment could be a valuable prediction tool in nodal PTCLs, however, it should be carefully interpreted in the treatment of extranodal subtypes. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0006-4971
,
1528-0020
DOI:
10.1182/blood.V128.22.1822.1822
Language:
English
Publisher:
American Society of Hematology
Publication Date:
2016
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1468538-3
detail.hit.zdb_id:
80069-7
