In:
GEOPHYSICS, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Vol. 49, No. 4 ( 1984-04), p. 477-477
Kurzfassung:
Mr. Pearson’s Discussion was received after answers by the author had been submitted to prior Discussions by Steenland and Herring. The essential criticisms of all three writers stem from two significant errors in the paper under discussion, namely (1) overstatement of the precision and resolving power of the Carson airborne gravity method based mainly on the 1981 test survey; (2) inadvertent errors in the dimensions of some of the data on Figure 8. An early attempt to publish a correction for item (1) (Hammer, 1982) has been delayed and is not yet in print. A revised Figure 8, redrawn to proper scale, is included as Figure 1 above in the Reply to Herring’s Discussion. Public criticism for my errors in this definitive paper on airborne gravity is useful.
Materialart:
Online-Ressource
ISSN:
0016-8033
,
1942-2156
Sprache:
Englisch
Verlag:
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Publikationsdatum:
1984
ZDB Id:
2033021-2
ZDB Id:
2184-2
SSG:
16,13
