In:
Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 6018-6018
Kurzfassung:
6018 Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) is often used for the staging of head and neck cancer (HNC). The purpose of this study is to explore the association between the increased utilization of PET and stage/survival in the managed care environment. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with HNC (n=958) between 2000-2008, at 4 integrated health systems (Group Health Cooperative, Seattle; Health Alliance Plan/Henry Ford Health System, Detroit; Kaiser Permanente Colorado and Northwest, Portland) were identified via tumor registries linked to claims data. We compared AJCC stage distribution, patient/treatment characteristics, and survival between pre-PET era (2000-2004) vs. PET era (2005-2008), and those with PET vs. those without, during the PET era. AJCC stage was grouped into stage I/II (localized), stage III/IVa/IVb (locally advanced), and stage IVc (metastatic). Ordered logistic regression estimated the effects of PET utilization on upstaging. Kaplan-Meier estimates described overall survival (OS) differences between PET users and nonusers in the PET era. Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated the effect of PET use on survival. Results: There was a non-significant increase in stage III/IVa/IVb (40% to 44%) with a decrease in stage I/II (58% to 52%) between pre-PET era and PET era (p=0.11). During the PET era, patients with PET were more likely stage III/IVa/IVb and less likely stage I/II compared to patients without PET (III/IVa/IVb: 62% vs. 29%, I/II: 35% vs. 68%). On multivariate analysis those who were staged with PET were twice as likely to have locally advanced disease (OR 2.091; p=0.006). There was no difference in stage IVc. Patients with PET scans were more likely to receive chemotherapy with radiation and less likely to receive no treatment. 3-year actuarial OS for patients (all stages) with and without PET was 81% vs. 77% (p=0.261). 3-year actuarial OS for patients staged III/IVa/IVb with and without PET was 58% vs. 41% (p= 0.001). Conclusions: HNC patients were more likely to be upstaged with the use of PET. There was an improvement in survival in stage III/IVa/IVb patients, but no difference in survival across all stages. This likely reflects selection bias and stage migration rather than improved outcomes among individual patients.
Materialart:
Online-Ressource
ISSN:
0732-183X
,
1527-7755
DOI:
10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.6018
Sprache:
Englisch
Verlag:
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Publikationsdatum:
2013
ZDB Id:
2005181-5
