In:
Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 8566-8566
Abstract:
8566 Background: The role of radiotherapy and intrathecal prophylaxis in extralymphatic craniofacial involvement of aggressive B-cell lymphoma remains to be determined in the rituximab era. Methods: In a retrospective subgroup analysis of 9 consecutive prospective DSHNHL trials covering all DLBCL risk groups from 18 to 60 years of age, patients with and without craniofacial involvement were compared with respect to clinical presentation, event-free and overall survival. Results: 336 sites of extralymphatic craniofacial involvement were observed in 284/3840 (7.4%) patients (orbita: 30, paranasal sinuses: 90; main nasal cavity: 38, tongue: 26, remaining oral cavity: 99, salivary glands: 53). In a multivariable analysis adjusting for IPI risk factors the addition of rituximab improved EFS and OS in both patients with and without craniofacial involvement. The 141 responding patients who received radiotherapy to sites of craniofacial involvement had a similar 3-year event-free (79% vs 79%; p=0.835) and 3-year overall survival (88% vs. 85%; p=0.311) when compared with the 56 patients who did not receive radiotherapy. Without rituximab, the 2-year-rate of cumulative risk of CNS disease was increased in 205 patients with compared to 2586 patients without craniofacial involvement (4.2% vs. 2.8%; p=0.038), while this difference disappeared in patients who received CHOP(like) chemotherapy in combination with rituximab (1.7% in 77 patients with compared to 2.9% in 946 patients without craniofacial involvement; p=0.868). Of 85 patients with craniofacial involvement who received intrathecal prophylaxis with methotrexate, the 2-year-rate of cumulative risk of CNS disease was 4.3% compared to 2.3% in 189 patients who did not (p=0.995). Conclusions: Rituximab eliminates the increased risk for CNS disease in patients with craniofacial involvement. As a practical consequence intrathecal prophylaxis and radiotherapy to sites of craniofacial involvement should not be given any more.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0732-183X
,
1527-7755
DOI:
10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.8566
Language:
English
Publisher:
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Publication Date:
2013
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2005181-5
