Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    The Company of Biologists ; 1939
    In:  Journal of Experimental Biology Vol. 16, No. 3 ( 1939-07-01), p. 251-257
    In: Journal of Experimental Biology, The Company of Biologists, Vol. 16, No. 3 ( 1939-07-01), p. 251-257
    Abstract: In the course of a recently published investigation (Wu, 1939) it was found that the gut of the earthworm differed from the well-known preparation of the dorsal musculature of the leech (Fühner, 1918; Minz, 1932), as regards its reactions to acetylcholine, in the following respects: (1) in the absence of eserine the body wall of the leech is very much less sensitive to acetylcholine than is the gut (crop and gizzard) of the earthworm, the lowest effective concentration of the drug being 10−4 to 10−5 for the former and 10−5 to 10−10 for the latter; (2) treatment with eserine increases the sensitivity to acetylcholine of the leech dorsum enormously and that of the earthworm gut only slightly, so that the former (lowest effective concentration 10−8 to 10−10) is now nearly as sensitive as the latter (10−10 to 10−10); (3) adopting the classification of Dale (1914), the action of acetylcholine on the leech is a “nicotine-action” (abolished by large doses of nicotine) while that on the earthworm gut is a “muscarine-action’’ (abolished by small doses of atropine). The question therefore arises, are these differences due to the fact that we are dealing with two species, earthworm and leech, or with two organs, body wall and gut? To answer this question, the writer has studied the action of acetylcholine and certain other relevant drugs on the body wall of the earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) and of the lugworm (Arenicola marina). By putting these results beside those already established for the leech, a comparison can be drawn between the reactions of the body wall in representatives of all of the three great divisions of the annelid phylum. As regards the gut, the data of Wu (1939) on the earthworm and of Wells (1937) on the lugworm are also available for comparison.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-0949 , 1477-9145
    Language: English
    Publisher: The Company of Biologists
    Publication Date: 1939
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1482461-9
    SSG: 12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages