In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 15, No. 12 ( 2020-12-9), p. e0243395-
Abstract:
Estimation of the postmortem interval in advanced postmortem stages is a challenging task. Although there are several approaches available for addressing postmortem changes of a (human) body or its environment (ecologically and/or biochemically), most are restricted to specific timeframes and/or individual and environmental conditions. It is well known, for instance, that buried bodies decompose in a remarkably different manner than on the ground surface. However, data on how established methods for PMI estimation perform under these conditions are scarce. It is important to understand whether and how postmortem changes are affected under burial conditions, if corrective factors could be conceived, or if methods have to be excluded for respective cases. We present the first multi-methodological assessment of human postmortem decomposition carried out on buried body donors in Europe, at the Amsterdam Research Initiative for Sub-surface Taphonomy and Anthropology (ARISTA) in the Netherlands. We used a multidisciplinary approach to investigate postmortem changes of morphology, skeletal muscle protein decomposition, presence of insects and other necrophilous animals as well as microbial communities (i.e., microbiomes) from August to November 2018 associated with two complete body exhumations and eight partial exhumations. Our results clearly display the current possibilities and limitations of methods for PMI estimation in buried remains and provide a baseline for future research and application.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.g005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.g006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s011
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s012
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s013
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s014
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s015
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s016
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s017
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s018
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s019
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s020
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0243395.s021
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2020
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3