In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 16, No. 10 ( 2021-10-28), p. e0258753-
Abstract:
Cattle are the main reservoir of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), with O157:H7 the distinctive serotype. EHEC is the main causative agent of a severe systemic disease, Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS). Argentina has the highest pediatric HUS incidence worldwide with 12–14 cases per 100,000 children. Herein, we assessed the genomes of EHEC O157:H7 isolates recovered from cattle in the humid Pampas of Argentina. According to phylogenetic studies, EHEC O157 can be divided into clades. Clade 8 strains that were classified as hypervirulent. Most of the strains of this clade have a Shiga toxin stx2a-stx2c genotype. To better understand the molecular bases related to virulence, pathogenicity and evolution of EHEC O157:H7, we performed a comparative genomic analysis of these isolates through whole genome sequencing. The isolates classified as clade 8 (four strains) and clade 6 (four strains) contained 13 to 16 lambdoid prophages per genome, and the observed variability of prophages was analysed. An inter strain comparison show that while some prophages are highly related and can be grouped into families, other are unique. Prophages encoding for stx2a were highly diverse, while those encoding for stx2c were conserved. A cluster of genes exclusively found in clade 8 contained 13 genes that mostly encoded for DNA binding proteins. In the studied strains, polymorphisms in Q antiterminator, the Q-stx2A intergenic region and the O and P γ alleles of prophage replication proteins are associated with different levels of Stx2a production. As expected, all strains had the pO157 plasmid that was highly conserved, although one strain displayed a transposon interruption in the protease EspP gene. This genomic analysis may contribute to the understanding of the genetic basis of the hypervirulence of EHEC O157:H7 strains circulating in Argentine cattle. This work aligns with other studies of O157 strain variation in other populations that shows key differences in Stx2a-encoding prophages.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.g005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.g006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.t003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.t004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.r001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.r002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.r003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.r004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.r005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0258753.r006
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2021
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3