In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 17, No. 4 ( 2022-4-20), p. e0265835-
Abstract:
The paper investigates potentials and challenges during the interpretation of prehistoric settlement dynamics based on large archaeological datasets. Exemplarily, this is carried out using a database of 1365 Neolithic sites in the Weiße Elster river catchment in Central Germany located between the southernmost part of the Northern German Plain and the Central Uplands. The recorded sites are systematically pre-processed with regard to their chronology, functional interpretation and spatial delineation. The quality of the dataset is reviewed by analyzing site distributions with respect to field surveys and modern land use. The Random Forests machine learning algorithm is used to examine the impact of terrain covariates on the depth of sites and pottery preservation. Neolithic settlement dynamics are studied using Site Exploitation Territories, and site frequencies per century are used to compare the intensity of land use with adjacent landscapes. The results show that the main trends of the Neolithic settlement dynamics can be derived from the dataset. However, Random Forests analyses indicate poor pottery preservation in the Central Uplands and a superimposition of Neolithic sites in the southernmost part of the Northern German Plain. Throughout the Neolithic the margins between soils on loess and the Weiße Elster floodplain were continuously settled, whereas only Early and Late Neolithic land use also extended into the Central Uplands. These settlement patterns are reflected in the results of the Site Exploitation Territories analyses and explained with environmental economic factors. Similar with adjacent landscapes the Middle Neolithic site frequency is lower compared to earlier and later periods.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.g005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.g006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.g007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.g008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.g009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.g010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.t003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s011
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s012
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s013
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s014
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s015
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s016
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265835.s017
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3