In:
Interventional Cardiology Review, Radcliffe Media Media Ltd, Vol. 4, No. 1 ( 2009), p. 48-
Abstract:
Recent years have seen an ongoing debate as to whether coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the most appropriate revascularisation strategy for patients with coronary heart disease (CAD). The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) study was conducted with the intention of defining the specific roles of each therapy in the management of de novo three-vessel disease or left main CAD. Interim results after 12 months show that PCI leads to significantly higher rates of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events compared with CABG (17.8 versus 12.4; p=0.002), largely owing to increased rates of repeat revascularisation. However, CABG was much more likely to lead to stroke. Interestingly, categorisation of patients by severity of CAD complexity according to the SYNTAX score has shown that there are certain patients in whom PCI can yield results that are comparable to, if not better than, those achieved with CABG. Careful clinical evaluation and comprehensive assessment of CAD severity, alongside application of the SYNTAX score, can aid practitioners in selecting the most suitable therapy for each individual CAD patient.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1756-1477
DOI:
10.15420/icr.2009.4.1.48
Language:
English
Publisher:
Radcliffe Media Media Ltd
Publication Date:
2009
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2813989-6
