Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Vol. 103, No. 6 ( 2021-3-17), p. 483-488
    In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 103, No. 6 ( 2021-3-17), p. 483-488
    Abstract: Alignment adequate to offer nonoperative treatment after reduction of a distal radial fracture is a matter of opinion. This study addressed factors associated with interobserver reliability of satisfaction with alignment after the reduction of a distal radial fracture. Methods: A survey sent to members of the Science of Variation Group divided the participants into 4 groups that each rated 24 sets of radiographs of adult patients with a distal radial fracture before and after manipulative reduction and cast or splint immobilization. This resulted in a total of 96 fractures rated by 111 participants. Observers indicated whether they were satisfied with the reduction, meaning that nonoperative treatment was an option, or not, meaning that they recommend surgery. The Fleiss kappa was used to measure reliability. Results: There was fair reliability of satisfaction with reduction of a distal radial fracture (kappa, 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28 to 0.41]). No surgeon factors were associated with variations in reliability. Multivariable linear regression analysis indicated that every degree decrease in dorsal angulation of the distal part of the radius on the lateral radiograph increased satisfaction by a mean of 1% (beta, −0.01 [95% CI, −0.02 to −0.006] ; p = 0.001); each millimeter decrease in the anterior-to-posterior distance between the dorsal and volar articular margins on the lateral radiograph increased satisfaction by 3% (beta, −0.03 [95% CI, –0.04 to −0.005]; p = 0.014), and each millimeter decrease in ulnar positive variance increased satisfaction by 6% (beta, −0.06 [95% CI, −0.08 to −0.03] ; p 〈 0.001), accounting for 44% of the observed variation. Conclusions: Surgeons are influenced by radiographic deformity, but do not agree on adequate alignment after reduction of a distal radial fracture. Clinical Relevance: Greater involvement of patients in decisions with regard to acceptable deformity has the potential to decrease treatment variation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0021-9355 , 1535-1386
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages