Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2014
    In:  Women's Health Vol. 10, No. 5 ( 2014-09), p. 511-518
    In: Women's Health, SAGE Publications, Vol. 10, No. 5 ( 2014-09), p. 511-518
    Abstract: Aim: To illustrate the differences between invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas (ILCs and IDCs) in terms of baseline demographics, pathologic features and recurrence in Egyptian breast cancer patients. Patients & methods: Retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients diagnosed and treated between 2000 and 2008 was performed. Results: 176 (8.5%) and 1758 (85%) cases were diagnosed with ILC and IDC, respectively. Compared with IDC, ILC was less observed in patients under 35 years of age (3.4 vs 9.3%; p = 0.009), and was associated with more bilaterality (p = 0.001), advanced tumor stage (p = 0.027) and nodal involvement (p = 0.004). On the other hand, IDC was significantly associated with more luminal B-like phenotype (16.9 vs 8.1%; p 〈 0.001) and more HER2-enriched disease (11.5 vs 2.7%; p 〈 0.001). At a median follow-up time of 64 months, ILC histology was independently associated with better disease-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.36-0.93; p = 0.023). Bone and peritoneal relapses were more common in ILC, while lung relapses were more common in IDC. Conclusion: ILC has distinct biologic and prognostic features that may warrant different therapeutic approaches.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1745-5065 , 1745-5065
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2254618-2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages