Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation) ; 2020
    In:  The Angle Orthodontist Vol. 90, No. 1 ( 2020-01-14), p. 109-117
    In: The Angle Orthodontist, The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation), Vol. 90, No. 1 ( 2020-01-14), p. 109-117
    Abstract: To evaluate the perception of esthetic orthodontic appliances by means of eye-tracking measurements and survey investigation. Materials and Methods En face and close-up images with different orthodontic appliances (aligner appliance [a], aligner appliance and attachments [b] , lingual appliance [c], ceramic brackets [d] , no appliance [e; control]) were shown to 140 participants. Eye movement and gaze direction was recorded by eye-tracking system. For different anatomical areas and areas of the appliances, time to first fixation and total fixation time were recorded. The questions included in a visual analog scale regarding individual sentiency were answered by the participants. Results For all groups, the anatomical landmarks were inspected in the following order: (1) eyes, (2) mouth, (3) nose, (4) hair, and (5) ears. Only in group d, first fixation was on the mouth region (1.10 ± 1.05 seconds). All appliances except the lingual appliance (1.87 ± 1.31 seconds) resulted in a longer fixation on the mouth area (a, 2.97 ± 1.32 seconds; b, 3.35 ± 1.38 seconds; d, 3.29 ± 1.36 seconds). For close-up pictures, the fastest (0.58 seconds) and longest (3.14 seconds) fixation was found for group d, followed by group b (1.02 seconds/2.3 seconds), group a (2.57 seconds/0.83 seconds), and group c (3.28 seconds/0.05 seconds). Visual analog scale scoring of questions on visibility were consistent with eye-tracking measurements. With increasing visibility, the feeling of esthetic impairment was considered higher. Conclusions Lingual orthodontic appliances do not change how the face is perceived. Other esthetic orthodontic appliances may change the pattern of facial inspection and are different in subjective perception.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0003-3219
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026352-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages