In:
Frontiers in Genetics, Frontiers Media SA, Vol. 13 ( 2022-4-14)
Abstract:
A common application of differential expression analysis is finding genes that are differentially expressed upon treatment in only one out of several groups of samples. One of the approaches is to test for significant difference in expression between treatment and control separately in the two groups, and then select genes that show statistical significance in one group only. This approach is then often combined with a gene set enrichment analysis to find pathways and gene sets regulated by treatment in only this group. Here we show that this procedure is statistically incorrect and that the interaction between treatment and group should be tested instead. Moreover, we show that gene set enrichment analysis applied to such incorrectly defined genes group-specific genes may result in misleading artifacts. Due to the presence of false negatives, genes significant in one, but not the other group are enriched in gene sets which correspond to the overall effect of the treatment. Thus, the results appear related to the problem at hand, but do not reflect the group-specific effect of a treatment. A literature search revealed that more than a quarter of papers which used a Venn diagram to illustrate the results of separate differential analysis have also applied this incorrect reasoning.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1664-8021
DOI:
10.3389/fgene.2022.818683
Language:
Unknown
Publisher:
Frontiers Media SA
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2606823-0
