In:
Frontiers in Surgery, Frontiers Media SA, Vol. 10 ( 2023-9-20)
Abstract:
Understanding tumor localization in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate is challenging for urologists but of great importance in mpMRI-fused prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of 3D printed models of the prostate to help urologists to locate tumors. Methods and Participants 20 urologists from University Medical Center Mainz (Germany) were asked to plot the location of a cancer suspicious lesion (PI-RADS ≥ 4) on a total of 30 mpMRI on a prostate sector diagram. The following 3 groups (as matched triplets) were divided into: mpMRI only, mpMRI with radiological report and mpMRI with 3D printed model (scaled 1:1). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way and two-way ANOVA (with bonferroni post-test). Results Overall, localization of the suspicious lesion was superior with the radiological report (median of max. 10 [IQR]: MRI 2 [IQR 1;5] , MRI + report: 8 [6.3;9], MRI + 3D model 3 [1.3;5.8] ; p & lt; 0.001). Residents with & lt;1 year of experience had a significantly higher detection rate using a 3D printed model [5 (5;5.8)] compared to mpMRI alone [1.5 (1;3.5)] ( p & lt; 0.05). Regarding the estimation of index lesion extension, the 3D model showed a significant benefit (mean percentage difference [95% CI]: MRI alone 234% [17.1;451.5] , MRI + report 114% [78.5;149.6], MRI + 3D model 17% [−7.4;41.3] ( p & lt; 0.01). Conclusion Urologists still need the written radiological report for a sufficient understanding of tumor localization. The effectiveness of the 3D printed model regarding tumor localization is particularly evident in young residents ( & lt;1 year) and leads to a better overall assessment of the tumor extension.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
2296-875X
DOI:
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1264164
Language:
Unknown
Publisher:
Frontiers Media SA
Publication Date:
2023
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2773823-1
