Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Royal College of General Practitioners ; 2023
    In:  British Journal of General Practice Vol. 73, No. 727 ( 2023-02), p. e115-e123
    In: British Journal of General Practice, Royal College of General Practitioners, Vol. 73, No. 727 ( 2023-02), p. e115-e123
    Kurzfassung: Colon cancer survivorship care constitutes both follow-up and aftercare. GP involvement may help to personalise care. Aim To explore patients’ experiences of GP-led versus surgeon-led survivorship care. Design and setting Patients with stage I to III colon cancer were recruited from eight Dutch hospitals and randomised to receive care by either the GP or surgeon. Method A mixed-methods approach was used to compare GP-led care with surgeon-led care. After 1 year the Consumer Quality Index (CQI) was used to measure quality aspects of care. Next, interviews were performed at various time points (3–6 years after surgery) to explore patients’ experiences in depth. Results A total of 261 questionnaires were returned by patients and 25 semi-structured interviews were included in the study. Overall, patients were satisfied with both GP-led and surgeon-led care (ratings 9.6 [standard deviation {SD} 1.1] versus 9.4 [SD 1.1] out of 10). No important differences were seen in quality of care as measured by CQI. Interviews revealed that patients often had little expectation of care from either healthcare professional. They described follow-up consultations as short, medically oriented, and centred around discussing follow-up test results. Patients also reported few symptoms. Care for patients in the GP-led group was organised in different ways, ranging from solely on patient’s initiative to shared care. Patients sometimes desired a more guiding role from their GP, whereas others preferred to be proactive themselves. Conclusion Patients experienced a high quality of colon cancer survivorship care from both GPs and surgeons. If the GP is going to be more involved, patients require a clear understanding of roles and responsibilities.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0960-1643 , 1478-5242
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Royal College of General Practitioners
    Publikationsdatum: 2023
    ZDB Id: 1043148-2
    ZDB Id: 2097982-4
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz