In:
Research Ideas and Outcomes, Pensoft Publishers, Vol. 3 ( 2017-04-18)
Abstract:
Traditionally, the neurological correlates of IQ test questions are characterized qualitatively in terms of ‘control of attention’ and ‘working memory.’ In this report we attempt to characterize each IQ test question quantitatively by two factors: a) the number of disparate objects that have to be imagined in concert in order to solve the problem and, b) the amount of recruited posterior cortex territory. With such a classification, an IQ test can be understood on a neuronal level and a subject’s IQ score could be interpreted in terms of specific neurological mechanisms available to the subject. Here we present the results of an analysis of the three most popular nonverbal IQ tests: Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (TONI-4), Standard Raven's Progressive Matrices, and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-V). Our analysis shows that approximately half of all questions (52±0.02%) are limited to mental computations involving only a single object; these easier questions are found towards the beginning of each test. More difficult questions located towards the end of each test rely on mental synthesis of several disparate objects and the number of objects involved in computations gradually increases with question difficulty. These more challenging questions require the organization of wider posterior cortex networks by the lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC). This conclusion is in line with neuroimaging studies showing that activation level of the lateral PFC and the posterior cortex positively correlates with task difficulty. This analysis has direct implications for brain pathophysiology and, specifically, for therapeutic interventions for children with language impairment, most notably for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and other developmental disorders.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
2367-7163
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure1
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure10
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure11
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure12
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure2a
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure2b
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure3a
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure3b
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure3c
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure4a
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure4b
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure5a
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure5b
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure5c
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure6a
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure6b
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure7
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure8
DOI:
10.3897/rio.3.e13239.figure9
Language:
Unknown
Publisher:
Pensoft Publishers
Publication Date:
2017
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2833254-4