ISSN:
0951-2748
Content:
"Regional order" was Michael Leifer's yardstick of choice to assess the international relations of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Leifer's recurrent theme was how elusive, and at times how illusory, regional order was for Southeast Asia. The elusiveness of regional order is attributed to ASEAN's lack of a set of genuinely shared assumptions about their interrelationships with each other and external states. This article challenges Leifer's portrait of a Southeast Asia devoid of regional order. I argue that Leifer's notion of order is theoretically underdeveloped and methodologically imprecise, allowing the analyst to see disorder in every minor perturbation in the region. I propose replacing "regional order" with "peace and stability", the preferred terms of the discourse by ASEAN's policy elites. By the latter criteria, ASEAN and the Asia-Pacific, contrary to the skeptics, have made impressive progress in the last forty years. (Pac Rev/DÜI)
In:
The Pacific review, Abingdon, Oxon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1988, 18(2005), 1, Seite 23-41, 0951-2748
In:
volume:18
In:
year:2005
In:
number:1
In:
pages:23-41
Language:
English
