ISSN:
1478-4505
Content:
International policy suggests that collaborative priority setting (CPS) between researchers and end users of research should shape the research agenda, and can increase capacity to address the research-practice translational gap. There is limited research evidence to guide how this should be done to meet the needs of dynamic healthcare systems. One-off priority setting events and time-lag between decision and action prove problematic. This study illustrates the use of CPS in a UK research collaboration called Collaboration and Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC).
In:
Health research policy and systems, London : BioMed Central, 2003, 13(2015), 25, Seite 1-11, 1478-4505
In:
volume:13
In:
year:2015
In:
number:25
In:
pages:1-11
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1186/s12961-015-0014-y