UID:
almafu_9960117207402883
Umfang:
1 online resource (pages 5131-5649) :
,
digital, PDF file(s).
Ausgabe:
First edition.
ISBN:
9781108168656
,
1108168655
,
9781108173476
,
1108173470
,
9781108159845
,
1108159842
Serie:
World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Reports
Inhalt:
The Dispute Settlement Reports of the World Trade Organization (WTO) include Panel and Appellate Body reports, as well as arbitration awards, in disputes concerning the rights and obligations of WTO members under the provisions of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. These are the WTO authorized and paginated reports in English. They are an essential addition to the library of all practicing and academic trade lawyers, and needed by students worldwide taking courses in international economic or trade law. DSR 2015: Volume 10 reports on United States - Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products - Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Mexico (WT/DS381).
Anmerkung:
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 29 Sep 2017).
,
Cover -- Title page -- Half-title -- Copyright information -- TABLE OF CONTENTS -- UNITED STATES - MEASURES CONCERNING THE IMPORTATION, MARKETING AND SALE OF TUNA AND TUNA PRODUCTS -- Report of the Appellate Body -- LIST OF ANNEXES -- ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT -- PANEL EXHIBITS CITED IN THIS REPORT -- CASES CITED IN THIS REPORT -- 1. INTRODUCTION -- 2. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTICIPANTS -- 3. ARGUMENTS OF THE THIRD PARTICIPANTS -- 4. ISSUES RAISED IN THIS APPEAL -- 5. PRELIMINARY ISSUES -- 5.1 Business Confidential Information -- 5.2 The Scope of Article 21.5 Proceedings -- 6. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW OF THE MEASURE AT ISSUE -- 6.1 The Amended Tuna Measure -- 6.1.1 The ETP large purse-seine fishery -- 6.1.2 The non-ETP purse-seine fishery -- 6.1.3 "All other fisheries -- 6.2 Principal Modifications Under the Amended Tuna Measure -- 7. ANALYSIS OF THE APPELLATE BODY -- 7.1 Mexico's Claim Regarding the Amended Tuna Measure as a Whole -- 7.2 Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement -- 7.2.1 "Treatment no less favourable" under Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement -- 7.2.2 Less favourable treatment - Detrimental impact -- 7.2.2.1 The findings of detrimental impact in the original proceedings -- 7.2.2.2 The Panel's findings -- 7.2.2.3 Whether the Panel erred in its analysis of the detrimental impact of the amended tuna measure -- 7.2.3 Less favourable treatment - Stems exclusively from a legitimate regulatory distinction -- 7.2.3.1 Whether the Panel erred in its interpretation of Article 2.1 and its articulation of the legal standard for determining whether the detrimental impact on imported products stems exclusively from a legitimate regulatory distinction -- 7.2.3.2 Whether the Panel erred in its assessment of whether the detrimental impact of the amended tuna measure on Mexican tuna products stems exclusively from a legitimate regulatory distinction.
,
7.2.3.2.1 Preliminary observations -- 7.2.3.2.2 The eligibility criteria -- 7.2.3.2.3 The certification and tracking and verification requirements -- 7.2.3.3 Whether the Panel acted inconsistently with Article 11 of the DSU -- 7.2.3.4 Overall conclusions on the Panel's analysis under Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement -- 7.2.4 Completion of the legal analysis -- 7.3 Articles I, III, and XX of the GATT 1994 -- 7.3.1 Articles I:1 and III:4 of the GATT 1994 -- 7.3.2 The chapeau of Article XX of the GATT 1994 -- 7.3.2.1 The Panel's findings -- 7.3.2.2 Whether the Panel erred in its analysis under the chapeau of Article XX of the GATT 1994 -- 7.3.2.2.1 Discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail -- 7.3.2.2.2 Arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination -- 7.3.2.2.3 Conclusion -- 7.3.3 Completion of the legal analysis -- 7.3.3.1 Articles I:1 and III:4 of the GATT 1994 -- 7.3.3.2 Article XX of the GATT 1994 -- 8. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS -- ANNEX A -- ANNEX B -- ANNEX C -- ANNEX D -- Report of the Panel -- LIST OF ANNEXES -- CASES CITED IN THIS REPORT -- ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT -- 1. INTRODUCTION -- 1.1 General -- 1.2 Request for Enhanced Third-Party Rights -- 1.3 Background of the Dispute -- 2. PARTIES' REQUESTS FOR FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS -- 3. OVERVIEW OF THE MEASURE AT ISSUE -- 3.1 The Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act and its Original Implementing Regulations -- 3.2 The 2013 Final Rule -- 4. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES -- 5. ARGUMENTS OF THE THIRD PARTIES -- 6. INTERIM REVIEW -- 6.1 General Issues -- 6.2 Specific Issues -- 6.2.1 Evidence concerning observable and unobservable harms caused by different fishing methods -- 6.2.2 Description of the Appellate Body's finding on observed and unobserved harms caused by setting on dolphins as compared with other tuna fishing methods.
,
6.2.3 Mexico's evolving argument on the different observer requirements under Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement -- 6.2.4 Evidence concerning log-books -- 6.2.5 Tracking and verification systems -- 6.2.6 The Panel's description of Mexico's argument on less favourable treatment -- 6.2.7 Regulated vs. unregulated setting on dolphins -- 7. FINDINGS -- 7.1 Claims -- 7.2 Order of Analysis -- 7.3 Parameters of the Panel's Mandate: the Measure at Issue and the Scope of These Article 21.5 Proceedings -- 7.4 Burden and Standard of Proof Applicable in These Proceedings -- 7.4.1 Burden of proof -- 7.4.2 Standard of proof -- 7.5 Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement -- 7.5.1 Legal test under Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement -- 7.5.2 Application of Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement -- 7.5.2.1 Mexico's claim -- 7.5.2.2 The eligibility criteria -- 7.5.2.2.1 Arguments of the parties -- 7.5.2.2.2 Analysis by the Panel -- 7.5.2.3 Mexico's remaining claims of less favourable treatment: the different certification and tracking and verification requirements -- 7.5.2.4 The different certification requirements -- 7.5.2.4.1 Whether the different certification requirements modify the conditions of competition in the United States' market to the detriment of like Mexican tuna and tuna products -- 7.5.2.4.2 Whether the detrimental treatment caused by the different certification requirements stem exclusively from a legitimate regulatory distinction -- 7.5.2.5 The different tracking and verification requirements -- 7.5.2.5.1 Whether the different tracking and verification requirements modify the conditions of competition in the United States' market to the detriment of like Mexican tuna and tuna products -- 7.5.2.5.2 Whether the detrimental impact caused by the different tracking and verification requirements stem exclusively from a legitimate regulatory distinction.
,
7.6 Claims under the GATT 1994 -- 7.6.1 Article I:1 of the GATT 1994 -- 7.6.1.1 Legal test -- 7.6.1.2 Application -- 7.6.1.2.1 Arguments of the parties -- 7.6.1.2.2 Analysis by the Panel -- 7.6.2 Article III:4 of the GATT 1994 -- 7.6.2.1 Legal test -- 7.6.2.2 Application -- 7.6.2.2.1 Arguments of the parties -- 7.6.2.2.2 Analysis by the Panel -- 7.7 The United States' Defence Under Article XX of the GATT 1994 -- 7.7.1 Article XX(g) -- 7.7.1.1 Legal test under Article XX(g) -- 7.7.1.2 Application -- 7.7.1.2.1 Arguments of the parties -- 7.7.1.2.2 Analysis by the Panel -- 7.7.2 Article XX(b) -- 7.7.3 The chapeau of Article XX -- 7.7.3.1 Legal test under the chapeau of Article XX -- 7.7.3.2 Relationship between the chapeau of Article XX of the GATT 1994 and Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement -- 7.7.3.3 Application -- 7.7.3.3.1 Arguments of the parties -- 7.7.3.3.2 Analysis by the Panel -- 8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS -- Cumulative List of Published Disputes.
Weitere Ausg.:
ISBN 9781107194458
Weitere Ausg.:
ISBN 1107194458
Sprache:
Englisch
