Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY :Cambridge University Press,
    UID:
    almahu_9949586865402882
    Format: 1 online resource (xxvi, 350 pages) : , digital, PDF file(s).
    ISBN: 9781009198950 (ebook)
    Series Statement: Feminist judgments series
    Content: This volume, part of the Feminist Judgment Series, shows how feminist legal theory along with critical race theory and intersectional modes of critique might transform immigration law. Here, a diverse collection of scholars and lawyers bring critical feminist, race, and intersectional insights to Supreme Court opinions. Feminist reasoning values the perspectives of outsiders, exposes the deep-rooted bias in the legal opinions of courts, and illuminates the effects of ostensibly neutral policies that create and maintain oppression and hierarchy. One by one, the chapters reimagine the norms that drive immigration policies and practices. In place of discrimination and subordination, the authors demand welcome and equality. Where current law omits the voice and stories of noncitizens, the authors center their lives and experiences. Collectively, they reveal how a feminist vision of immigration law could center a commitment to equality and justice and foster a country where diverse newcomers readily flourish with dignity.
    Note: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 23 Oct 2023). , Introduction -- Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, and Jennifer J. Lee -- Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1875) / Commentary : Julie Dahlstrom, Judgment : Stewart Chang -- Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U.S. 651 (1892) / Commentary : Eunice C. Lee, Judgment : Stella Burch Elias -- United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) / Commentary : Rachel Rosenbloom, Judgment : Jonathan Weinberg -- United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923) / Commentary : Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Judgment : Joy Kanwar -- Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21 (1982) / Commentary : Sabrina Balgamwalla, Judgment : Erin Corcoran -- Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S 202 (1982) / Commentary : Michael Olivas, Judgment : Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia -- Jean v. Nelson, 472 U.S. 846 (1985) / Commentary : Raymond Audain, Judgment : Patricia Winograd -- Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993) / Commentary : Lindsay Harris, Judgment : Julia Hernández -- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) / Commentary : Nicole Hallett, Judgment : Stacy Caplow and Maryellen Fullerton -- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002) / Commentary : Ruben Garcia, Judgment : Kati Griffith -- Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010) / Commentary : Jack Chin, Judgment: Marissa Montes -- Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012) / Commentary : Kristina Campbell, Judgment : Annie Lai -- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 138 S. Ct. 830 (2018) / Commentary : Ahilan Arulanantham, Judgment : Sarah Sherman-Stokes and Sarah Schendel -- Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020) / Commentary : Kevin Johnson, Judgment : Jennifer Lee Koh.
    Additional Edition: Print version: ISBN 9781009198936
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages