Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

UID:

Umfang: 1 online resource (420 pages)

Ausgabe: 1st ed.

ISBN: 9789400111875

Anmerkung: Cover -- Title page -- Copyright -- Table of Contents -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 The ImprovEAW project -- 1.2 Genesis of the report -- 1.3 Brief outline of the report -- 2 Transposition and implementation of the Framework Decision -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Infringement procedures -- 2.3 Grounds for refusal and guarantees -- 2.3.1 Mandatory grounds -- 2.3.2 Optional grounds -- 2.3.3 Guarantees -- 2.3.4 Incorrect transposition of optional grounds to mandatory ones and vice versa -- 2.3.5 Additional grounds for refusal -- 2.3.6 Distinction based on nationality -- 2.4 Human rights concerns and detention conditions: the two-step test -- 2.5 Issuing an EAW -- 2.5.1 Issuing judicial authorities -- 2.5.2 Preparation of the EAW -- 2.5.3 National judicial decision (proportionality) -- 2.5.4 Proportionality of issuing an EAW -- 2.5.5 Execution-EAWs: coherence between legal instruments -- 2.5.6 Proportionality revisited -- 2.5.6.1 Introduction -- 2.5.6.2 Proportionality of the EAW is more than proportionality of a NAW -- 2.5.6.3 Factors determining proportionality and the interests of justice -- 2.5.6.4 Formal requirement: judicial review -- 2.5.7 Dual level of protection -- 2.6 Executing an EAW -- 2.6.1 Executing judicial authorities -- 2.6.2 Prosecutors as executing judicial authority -- 2.6.3 Proportionality of executing an EAW -- 2.7 Central authorities -- 2.8 Language requirements -- 2.9 Conditional surrender -- 2.10 Recommendations -- 3 The EAW-form -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.1.1 EAW-form -- 3.1.2 Validity of the EAW -- 3.1.3 EAW-form and the decision on the execution of an EAW -- 3.1.4 Recommendations regarding the EAW-form in general -- 3.2 Section (a) of the EAW-form -- 3.2.1 Legal framework -- 3.2.2 Section (a) in practice -- 3.2.2.1 Difficulties on the issuing side -- 3.2.2.2 Difficulties on the executing side. , 3.2.3 Recommendations regarding section (a) -- 3.3 Section (b) of the EAW-form -- 3.3.1 Legal framework -- 3.3.1.1 Introduction -- 3.3.1.2 Judicial decision -- 3.3.1.3 Enforceable judicial decision -- 3.3.1.4 Judicial decision 'coming with the scope of Articles 1 and 2' -- 3.3.1.5 Objectives of Art. 8(1)(c) of FD 2002/584/JHA -- 3.3.1.6 Arrest warrant or enforceable judicial decision having the same effect -- 3.3.1.7 Enforceable judgment -- 3.3.2 Section (b) in practice -- 3.3.2.1 Difficulties on the issuing side -- 3.3.2.2 Difficulties on the executing side -- 3.3.3 Recommendations regarding section (b) -- 3.3.3.1 Revocation of a suspended sentence/parole -- 3.3.3.2 Offences not covered by the national arrest warrant -- 3.3.3.3 'Finality' and 'enforceability' -- 3.4 Section (c) of the EAW-form -- 3.4.1 Legal framework -- 3.4.1.1 Introduction -- 3.4.1.2 Accessory surrender -- 3.4.1.2.1 Accessory extradition -- 3.4.1.2.2 Potential scope for accessory surrender -- 3.4.1.2.3 Accessory surrender allowed? -- 3.4.1.3 Sentence which may be imposed -- 3.4.1.3.1 Length of the sentence -- 3.4.1.3.2 Inchoate offences and participation -- 3.4.1.3.3 Multiple offences -- 3.4.1.4 Sentence which was imposed -- 3.4.1.4.1 Length of the sentence -- 3.4.1.4.2 Adding up sentences to reach the threshold -- 3.4.1.4.3 Single sentence for multiple offences: partial refusal -- 3.4.2 Section (c) in practice -- 3.4.2.1 Accessory surrender in practice -- 3.4.2.2 Sentence which may be imposed -- 3.4.2.2.1 Length of the sentence -- 3.4.2.2.2 Inchoate offences and participation -- 3.4.2.2.3 Multiple offences -- 3.4.2.3 Sentence which was imposed -- 3.4.2.3.1 Length of the sentence -- 3.4.2.3.2 Adding up sentences to reach the threshold -- 3.4.2.3.3 Single sentence for multiple offences: partial refusal -- 3.4.3 Recommendations regarding section (c). , 3.4.3.1 Correlating offences with sentences: cumulative sentences -- 3.4.3.2 Accessory surrender -- 3.4.3.3 Thresholds of Art. 2(1) of FD 2002/584/JHA -- 3.4.3.4 Sentence which was imposed -- 3.4.3.4.1 Length of the sentence -- 3.4.3.4.2 Adding up individual sentences of less than four months -- 3.5 Section (d) of the EAW -- 3.5.1 Legal framework -- 3.5.2 Section (d) in practice -- 3.5.3 Recommendations regarding section (d) -- 3.6 Section (e) -- 3.6.1 Legal framework -- 3.6.1.1 Introduction -- 3.6.1.2 The concept 'offence' -- 3.6.1.3 The structure of section (e) -- 3.6.1.3.1 The structure in general -- 3.6.1.3.2 Description of the offence -- 3.6.1.4 Listed offences -- 3.6.1.4.1 Introduction -- 3.6.1.4.2 Custodial sentence of three years -- 3.6.1.4.3 Description -- 3.6.1.4.4 Review -- 3.6.1.5 Ne bis in idem -- 3.6.1.5.1 Introduction -- 3.6.1.5.2 The 'same acts' -- 3.6.1.5.3 Ex officio application? -- 3.6.1.6 Double criminality -- 3.6.1.6.1 Introduction -- 3.6.1.6.2 Assessment of double criminality -- 3.6.1.6.3 Temporal point of reference -- 3.6.1.6.4 Refusal on account of lack of double criminality -- 3.6.1.7 Prosecution in the executing Member State for the same acts -- 3.6.1.7.1 Introduction -- 3.6.1.7.2 The 'same act' -- 3.6.1.8 Statute-barred criminal prosecution or punishment -- 3.6.1.8.1 Introduction -- 3.6.1.8.2 Temporal point of reference -- 3.6.2 Section (e) in practice -- 3.6.2.1 The structure of section (e) -- 3.6.2.1.1 The structure in general -- 3.6.2.1.2 Description of the offence -- 3.6.2.2 Listed offences -- 3.6.2.2.1 Introduction -- 3.6.2.2.2 Custodial sentence of three years -- 3.6.2.2.3 Description -- 3.6.2.2.4 Review -- 3.6.2.3 Ne bis in idem -- 3.6.2.3.1 Transposition -- 3.6.2.3.2 The 'same acts -- 3.6.2.3.3 Ex officio application? -- 3.6.2.4 Double criminality -- 3.6.2.4.1 Transposition. , 3.6.2.4.2 Assessment of double criminality -- 3.6.2.4.3 Temporal point of reference -- 3.6.2.4.4 Refusal on account of lack of double criminality -- 3.6.2.5 Prosecution in the executing Member State for the 'same acts' -- 3.6.2.5.1 Transposition -- 3.6.2.5.2 The 'same act' -- 3.6.2.6 Statute-barred criminal prosecution or punishment -- 3.6.2.6.1 Transposition -- 3.6.2.5.2 Temporal point of reference -- 3.6.3 Recommendations regarding section (e) -- 3.6.3.1 Structure of section (e) -- 3.6.3.2 Listed offences -- 3.6.3.3 Ne bis in idem -- 3.6.3.4 Double criminality -- 3.6.3.5 Statute-barred criminal prosecution or punishment -- 3.7 Section (f) of the EAW-form -- 3.7.1 Legal framework -- 3.7.1.1 Introduction -- 3.7.1.2 Information about extraterritoriality -- 3.7.1.3 Information about (interruption of periods of) time limitation -- 3.7.1.4 Other information -- 3.7.2 Section (f) in practice -- 3.7.2.1 Information provided by the issuing side -- 3.7.2.2 Information encountered by and wished for by the executing side -- 3.7.2.3 Difficulties with Art. 4(7)(b) of FD 2002/584/JHA -- 3.7.3 Recommendations regarding section (f) -- 3.8 Section (g) of the EAW-form -- 3.8.1 Legal framework -- 3.8.2 Section (g) in practice -- 3.8.2.1 Difficulties on the issuing side -- 3.8.2.2 Difficulties on the executing side -- 3.8.3 Recommendations regarding section (g) -- 3.9 Section (h) of the EAW-form -- 3.9.1 Legal framework -- 3.9.2 Section (h) in practice -- 3.9.2.1 Difficulties on the issuing side -- 3.9.2.2 Difficulties on the executing side -- 3.9.3 Recommendations regarding section (h) -- 3.10 Section (i) of the EAW-form -- 3.10.1 Legal framework -- 3.10.1.1 Introduction -- 3.10.2 Section (i) in practice -- 3.10.2.1 Difficulties on the issuing side -- 3.10.2.2 Difficulties on the executing side -- 3.10.3 Recommendations regarding section (i). , 4 Problems not directly related to the EAW-form -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Supplementary information - Art. 15(2)-(3) of FD 2002/584/JHA -- 4.2.1 Legal framework -- 4.2.1.1 When to use Art. 15 (2) and (3) of FD 2002/584/JHA -- 4.2.1.2 Type of information -- 4.2.1.3 Which authority should provide the information? -- 4.2.2 Legal practice -- 4.2.2.1 Authority that requests or provides supplementary information -- 4.2.2.2 Authority requesting the supplementary information -- 4.2.2.3 Proprio motu - Art. 15(3) of FD 2002/584/JHA -- 4.2.2.4 Type of information requested with Art. 15(2) of FD 2002/584/JHA -- 4.3 Detention conditions and deficiencies in the system of justice -- 4.3.1 Legal framework -- 4.3.1.1 Detention conditions -- 4.3.1.2 Deficiencies in the system of justice -- 4.3.2 Legal practice -- 4.3.2.1 Uneven trigger - uneven effect -- 4.3.2.2 Aranyosi and Caldararu test -- 4.3.2.3 Minister for Justice and Equality (Deficiencies in the system of justice) test -- 4.3.2.4 Sources to establish in abstracto risk -- 4.3.2.5 Supplementary information -- 4.3.2.6 Miscellaneous issues -- 4.4 Guarantee of return - Art. 5(3) of FD 2002/584/JHA -- 4.4.1 Legal framework -- 4.4.2 Legal practice -- 4.4.2.1 Implementation -- 4.4.2.2 Which instrument covers the return? -- 4.4.2.3 Consent and distinction between nationals/non-nationals -- 4.4.2.4 Authority -- 4.4.2.5 Uniform text for the guarantee -- 4.4.2.6 Other procedural steps and procedure of return -- 4.5 Time limits - Art. 17 of FD 2002/584/JHA -- 4.5.1 Legal framework -- 4.5.2 Legal Practice -- 4.5.2.1 Availability of data -- 4.5.2.2 The special case of the Netherlands -- 4.5.2.3 Informing Eurojust -- 4.5.2.4 Fixing a time limit for complying with the request of Art. 15(2) of FD 2002/584/JHA -- 4.6 Recommendations -- 4.7 New structures of cooperation in criminal matters with and within the EU. , 4.7.1 Surrender to and from Iceland and Norway.

Weitere Ausg.: Print version: Barbosa, Renata Improving the European Arrest Warrant The Hague : Boom Uitgevers Den Haag,c2022 ISBN 9789462363274

Sprache: Englisch

Schlagwort(e): Electronic books.

URL: Click to View