UID:
edocfu_9959202233202883
Format:
1 online resource (400 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
ISBN:
1-84731-755-3
,
1-4725-6070-1
,
1-282-71971-8
,
9786612719714
,
1-84731-567-4
Series Statement:
Landmark Cases
Content:
Landmark Cases in the Law of Tort contains thirteen original essays on leading tort cases, ranging from the early nineteenth century to the present day. It is the third volume in a series of collected essays on landmark cases (the previous two volumes having dealt with restitution and contract). The cases examined raise a broad range of important issues across the law of tort, including such diverse areas as acts of state and public nuisance, as well as central questions relating to the tort of negligence. Several of the essays place cases in their historical context in ways that change our understanding of the case's significance. Sometimes the focus is on drawing out previously neglected aspects of cases which have been - undeservedly - assigned minor importance. Other essays explore the judicial methodologies and techniques that worked to shape leading principles of tort law. So much of tort law turns on cases, and there are so many cases, that all but the most recent decisions have a tendency to become reduced to terse propositions of law, so as to keep the subject manageable. This collection shows how important it is, despite the constant temptation to compression, not to lose sight of the contexts and nuances which qualify and illuminate so many leading authorities
Note:
Description based upon print version of record.
,
R. v. Pease (1832) / Mark Wilde and Charlotte Smith -- Buron v. Denman (1848) / Charles Mitchell and Leslie Turano -- George v. Skivington (1869) / David Ibbetson -- Daniel v. Metropolitan Railway Company (1871) / Michael Lobban -- Woodley v. Metropolitan District Railway Company (1877) / Steve Banks -- Cavalier v. Pope (1906) / Richard Baker and Jonathan Garton -- Hedley Byrne & Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners Ltd. (1963) / Paul Mitchell -- Goldman v. Hargrave (1967) / Mark Lunney -- Tate & Lyle Food & Distribution Ltd. v. Greater London Council (1983) / J.W. Neyers -- Smith v. Littlewoods Organisation Ltd. (1985) / Elspeth Reid -- Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1991) / Donal Nolan -- Hunter v. Canary Wharf Ltd. (1997) / Maria Lee -- Fairchild v. Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd. (2002) / Ken Oliphant
,
1 R v Pease (1832) -- MARK WILDE AND CHARLOTTE SMITH -- 2 Burón v Denman (1848) -- CHARLES MITCHELL AND LESLIE TURANO -- 3 George v Skivington (1869) -- DAVID IBBETSON -- 4 Daniel v Metropolitan Railway Company (1871) -- MICHAEL LOBBAN -- 5 Woodley v Metropolitan District Railway Company (1877) -- STEVE BANKS -- 6 Cavalier v Pope (1906) -- RICHARD BAKER AND JONATHAN GARTON -- 7 Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd (1963) -- PAUL MITCHELL -- 8 Goldman v Hargrave (1967) -- MARK LUNNEY -- 9 Tate & Lyle Food & Distribution Ltd v Greater London Council -- (1983) -- JW NEYERS -- 10 Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd (1985) -- ELSPETH REID -- 11 Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1991) -- DONAL NOLAN -- 12 Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd (1997) MARIA LEE -- 13 Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd (2002) -- KEN OLIPHANT
,
Also issued in print
,
English
Additional Edition:
ISBN 1-5099-0507-3
Additional Edition:
ISBN 1-84946-003-5
Language:
English
DOI:
10.5040/9781472560704
