Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Berlin ; : Walter de Gruyter,
    UID:
    almafu_9959229259002883
    Format: 1 online resource (324 pages)
    Edition: Reprint 2013
    ISBN: 3-11-088110-1
    Series Statement: Studia Linguistica Germanica ; 60
    Content: Anhand der Geschichte des Hilfsverbs tun (Susanne tut gern Kuchen essen) seit 1350 wird gezeigt, dass präskriptive Grammatiker im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert aktiv in den Standardisierungesprozess eingegriffen haben, um gewisse morphosyntaktische Konstruktionen von der Prestigesprache "Standarddeutsch" fernzuhalten.
    Content: The auxiliary do (tun) is one of the most-discussed constructions in West Germanic. In German, there is a striking opposition between modern standard German, where the construction is virtually ungrammatical and considered to be "sub-standard" by most speakers, whilst, as this book shows, the construction is attested in all modern dialects as well as historic stages since 1350. In answering why auxiliary tun is ungrammatical in modern standard German, it is shown that the stigmatization of tun was caused by prescriptive grammarians in the 16th-18th century. Furthermore it is shown that the stigmatization of tun as "bad" German occurred in clearly discernible stages, from bad poetry (1550-1680), to bad written German (1680-1740) and finally to "bad" German in general (after 1740), thus providing evidence that the history of the standardization of German needs to take into account direct metalinguistic comments from prescriptive grammarians. The effectiveness of linguistic purism is also shown by evidence from two other constructions, namely polynegation and double perfect.
    Note: Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 2000. , Front matter -- , Table of Content -- , Acknowledgements -- , Abbreviations -- , 1. Introduction -- , 2. Part I. The Distribution of Auxiliary Tun -- , 3. Part II. The Stigmatization of Auxiliary Tun -- , 4. Conclusion -- , 5. Appendix: Data and Bibliographies , Issued also in print. , English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 3-11-177666-2
    Additional Edition: ISBN 3-11-017024-8
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages