UID:
almafu_9959231571502883
Format:
1 online resource (709 p.)
ISBN:
0-19-170671-X
,
0-19-101884-8
,
0-19-158243-3
Series Statement:
Oxford Studies in European Law
Content:
Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy.Examining the judicial argumentation of the United States Supreme Court and of the French Cour de cassation, the book first reorders the traditional comparative understanding of the difference between French civil law and American common law judicial decision-making. It then uses this analysis to offer the first detailed
Note:
Description based upon print version of record.
,
Cover; Title Page; Copyright Page; Preface to the Paperback Edition; General Editors' Preface; Dedication; Acknowledgements; Contents; Epigraphs; 1. Introduction; PART I The Three Courts-Raw Analysis; 2. The French Bifurcation; 3. The American Unification; 4. The European Union: Discursive Bifurcation Revisited; PART II Bifurcation; 5. Similarity and Difference; 6. France: How is the Discursive Bifurcation Maintained?; 7. The ECJ: The French Bifurcation Reworked; PART III Comparison; 8. The Sliding Scales; 9. Apples and Oranges; 10. On Judicial Transparency, Control, and Accountability
,
11. On Judicial Debate, Deliberation, and Legitimacy12. Concluding Postscript; Bibliography; Index; Notes
,
English
Additional Edition:
ISBN 0-19-957516-9
Additional Edition:
ISBN 1-306-13485-4
Language:
English
Subjects:
Law
