UID:
almafu_9960119135102883
Format:
1 online resource (xiv, 198 pages) :
,
digital, PDF file(s).
ISBN:
1-108-92483-2
,
1-108-92342-9
,
1-108-91820-4
Series Statement:
Comparative constitutional law and policy
Content:
This comparative study of the constitutional jurisprudence of three East Asian jurisdictions investigates how the rulings of the Constitutional Court of Taiwan, the Constitutional Court of Korea and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal have converged. The unique political contexts of all three jurisdictions have led to strong courts using the structured proportionality doctrine and innovative constitutional remedies to address human rights issues. Hong Kong, Taiwan, and South Korea have the only courts in Asia that regularly use a structured four-stage Proportionality Analysis to invalidate laws, and routinely apply innovative constitutional remedies such as Suspension Orders and Remedial Interpretation to rectify constitutionally flawed legislation. This volume explores how judges in these areas are affected by politics within their different constitutional systems. The latest developments in Asian constitutional law are covered, with detailed analysis of key cases.
Note:
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 24 Nov 2021).
,
Introduction -- Reasons for convergence -- Convergence on structured proportionality -- Convergence on innovative constitutional remedies -- Limits on convergence -- Conclusion.
Additional Edition:
Print version: Yap, Po Jen Constitutional Convergence in East Asia Cambridge : Cambridge University Press,c2021 ISBN 9781108831178
Language:
English
URL:
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108923422
