Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Berlin ; : Mouton de Gruyter,
    UID:
    edocfu_9959241872502883
    Format: 1 online resource (216 p.)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 1-282-19387-2 , 9786612193873 , 3-11-019734-0
    Series Statement: Interface explorations ; 8
    Content: This book investigates the distribution and interpretation of Covert Modality. Covert Modality is modality which we interpret but which is not associated with any lexical item in the structure that we are interpreting. This dissertation investigates a class of environments that involves covert modality. Examples of covert modality include wh-infinitival complements, infinitival relative clauses, purpose clauses, the 'have to' construction, and the 'is to' construction (cf. 1): 1a. Tim knows [how to solve the problem]. ("Tim knows how one/he could/should solve the problem.")1b. Jane found [a book to draw cartoons in] for Sara. ("Jane found a book for Sara one could/should draw cartoons in.")1c. [The man to fix the sink] is here. ("The man whose purpose is to fix the sink is here.")1d. Sue went to Torino [to buy a violin]. ("Sue went to Torino so that she could buy a violin.") 1e. Bill has to reach Philadelphia before noon. ("Bill must reach Philadelphia before noon.")1f. Will is to leave tomorrow. ("Will is scheduled/supposed to leave tomorrow.") The interpretation of (1a-f) involves modality; however, there is no lexical item that seems to be the source of the modality. What (1a-f) have in common is that they involve infinitivals. This book addresses the following questions about covert modality: what is the source of this modality, what are its semantic properties, why are some but not all infinitival relatives modal, and why are all infinitival questions modal? The infinitival [+wh] Complementizer is identified as the source of the covert modality. The apparent variability of the force of this modality is related to the particular semantics of this Complementizer. Infinitival relatives that receive a non-modal interpretation are analyzed as being reduced relatives and thus not involving the infinitival [+wh] Complementizer.
    Note: Description based upon print version of record. , Dissertation University of Pennsylvania 1999. , Front matter -- , Contents -- , Chapter 1. Introduction -- , Chapter 2. The syntax of infinitival relatives -- , Chapter 3. Non-Modal subject infinitival relatives -- , Chapter 4. Infinitival questions -- , Chapter 5. Ability modals and their actuality entailments -- , Back matter , Issued also in print. , English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 3-11-017952-0
    Language: English
    Subjects: Comparative Studies. Non-European Languages/Literatures
    RVK:
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages